Discussion Paper: Are Analysts Providing Measurable ‘Added-Value’?
Once companies have provided financial guidance: Are analysts’ forecasts
able to add any extra value? If so, how often and by how much?
A study by AKRO
investiční společnost, comparing the accuracy of analyst forecasts and
management forecasts, shows that so called ‘post event’ analyst forecasts, i.e.
those made post recent results/management guidance, are in general more
accurate than management forecasts. Both the frequency and magnitude of the
greater accuracy prove significant, a somewhat reassuring conclusion for
research analysts.
If analysts are
able to provide insights with regard to tangible measures of value, it seems
logical to assume analysts are also able to provide insights with regard to
less tangible measures of value, e.g. management quality, industry outlook. At
a time when the ‘active’ asset management industry is getting a bad press, and
many research departments are being downsized[i],
the results should give pause for thought.
2 komentářů: